Worthy but admittedly dull vid ~ look closely and you'll see he's asleep ~ about how Amazon has withdrawn from the Commercial Drone Alliance due a disagreement over how these things ought to navigate to your front door. And he should know, as he was responsible for the security of such systems.
BVLOS means Beyond Visual Line of Sight, which is akin to letting the puppy off the lead. Once beyond the purview of any operator, such things can in theory navigate purely by GPS. Except that, as Amazon points out, GPS can be spoofed. Argument is that drones need a sub for the adult in the room in the form of autonomous sensors and they compare it to the difference between car and horse ~ a car can be driven into a brick wall, knowing no better, whilst a horse cannot.
Upshot being drones based purely on a system called ADS-B commercial aeroplanes use ~ which transmits position, direction and speed ~ cannot be relied upon for the avoidance of collisions (and that's a big drone to hit your flight deck at 300 knots). And worse, it leaves open the possibility that such drones might be hijacked to be driven into power-plants, football stadia or any place else you might imagine.
Whether flying taxis or delivery drones, with each being a wholly new industry and involving so many people without prior knowledge of aviation, the thought was that these toys could be scaled up without anyone ever getting hurt.
One channel I do dip into from time to time is by an ex-F15 jock called Hoover, who reviews crashes occurring principally among light aircraft. The standout takeaway from which is that ~ despite flying being well over a century old ~ there is ample material for Hoover to draw upon every passing month.
So it won't be a question of how personal air vehicles, flying taxis or delivery drones crash, so much as how.
One thing that can be said about Amazon is you don't get that big by being dumb.