Sunday, March 29, 2026

Carrier Advice


The attraction of a wearable frame that electrification was beginning to look possible was that, from my own point of view, it didn't require a trailer. Once it was obvious that some from of airframe was going to be required, the latter means to haul ass was to become compulsory.

If you look at any of the personal air vehicles which abound in experimental form at least, all require a great deal of weight to be carried whether in connection with one such airframe, or else by the human frame itself. That human frame only relatively lately evolved in an upright form, leaving backache among its commonest ailments.

Furthermore the worst possible means of sustaining high G-force ~ like for instance during a heavy landing that includes the weight of an aircraft ~ and that's you laid up for a long time with a crushed vertebra or two. This is why strapping propellers to your outline is best left to AI and the short video format.

At least it planted the idea, and years later it's good to come back to being able to go trailer-less and ~ as so many do with bikes ~ hit the road with a rack out back. That said there can't be many sales staff asked how the vehicle enables a maritime drone launch besides the school-run?

It's taken the best part of the day to mock this up in laminated foam left over from a previous build, but it answered all of the questions in my head and is ready to be put into concrete form ...I'll pass the pattern seen below to my CAD/CAM people for a 3-D printout the carbon-fiber division can use for a bespoke product.

Ed. What he means is he'll be using that plywood left over from fixing the toilet, but doesn't need the competition knowing that.

Aircraft Carrier 2.0


Eat your heart out, Adrian Newey, you're not the only one who prefers using paper to computer screens for drafting modifications to racing cars or maritime drones!

Can't believe I cut a hole in the drone to accommodate carriage on a tail-gate, and albeit at first reluctantly I've gone to work on the adapter I said I'd never use.

Bolted in place of a spare wheel, the back-end of the boat's centre-section will slide into place with a satisfying 'action' which would make IKEA themselves proud.

And do you remember the centre-section we rejected because it was too big?

You know, the one painted Kermit-green that you said looked shite?

We may be able to use it instead of plywood left over from our work on the toilet, Gromit!

Sent to Coventry?


Rarely engage in public discourse and like Howard Hughes prefer to stay inside with pizzas slipped under the door, but have chipped in on the prospects of UAM as agin those for drones generally. UAM is, or was until AI came along, what investors were most exercised about at least until war broke out (again) in the Middle East.

Where aviation is concerned, we live in a mass market world in which you're either big or else nothing at all... whether that applies to manufacture or services. Look at what you use on a daily basis to get by, and who owns and operates it. Aviation is no different, and the reason for instance the world's richest man is in a flame-war of his own with one among Ireland's richest: who runs the third most profitable airline.

The vast majority of people will never fly in any shape or form throughout their lives or else if they do, it will be in an airliner. General aviation is dying on its feet, sport aviation thrives if only on a largely kit-built basis. If air taxis are to succeed on any scale it will be in China, for the reason that aviation has largely just opened up, the space is available for infrastructure and there are no holds barred in terms of both the planning and regulation required.

My father was a telephone engineer and bemoaned how places like Ireland could go down the digital route altogether faster because they were not ham-strung with the existing technology. Africa went a step further and skipped land-lines altogether in favour of going direct to mobile (or cell).

China has money and means to skip that bit requiring helicopters and do the same with the electrical transition, whether that applies to VTOL types or those airplanes now able to lift off and land on the sort of shorter runways that places like the UK is closing down at pace: desperate as it is for revenue from retail parks and housing.

A case in point of how the UK has turned itself deliberately, starting with Thatcher's efforts to sell off the family silver, from a manufacturing to a servant economy that services the whims of nations and wealthy individuals from elsewhere. Flying taxis fit into this nicely, catering to one more of those whims the world neither needs nor can afford.

Thus it was that talented and well-qualified architects show-cased its 'urban airport' concept in Coventry, backed by 'green' grants that look daily sillier as the prices rise at the petrol-pumps and we all turn off our gas-boilers in favour of an extra layer. The city of Coventry proved two things in WW2 viz. the effectiveness of bombs and guided missiles in destroying a place but ~ in the aftermath at Dresden ~ it's total incapacity to destroy the will of a nation in their defence.

The local council and government thus fell over themselves to provide land for the 'world's first vertiport', selecting an edge-of-town car-park and displacing its clients without I am guessing, a by-your-leave. The vertiport I suspect once the lager had been drunk and the finger-food consumed would like Thatcher's Britain remain as a monument to making the country great again, but instead reverted to a car-park.

In fact it is perfectly placed on the southern edge of the ring-road for town-centre and railway station adjoining... which is why it will be full of cars daily instead of a tent designed for electrical helicopters arriving and departing one at a time.

And here's the rub. Most people live in cities, and of those most in the suburbs and most have a car to maybe get to places like vertiports to take a flying taxi; except now there is nowhere to park, like a next-century version of the school-run.

So what does Daddy do? He says "Fuck it kids, let's drive to Disneyland and stop at a Maccies instead, eh?".

My co-correspondent is based in Holland and not Oz as I thought. Love the Dutch, the only people prepared to co-invest in the company that supplies the world from Taiwan with the chips it increasingly relies upon.

But I worked there as an Airbus captain at V-bird, a partner of an airline Dutch-bird. It went bust, as do most airlines unable to launch themselves into the mass-market stratosphere ~ but after it did, Dutch journalists wrote with some credibility that the two airlines had principally been a perfect means of laundering very large quantities of cash for (mass-market) drug cartels.

Pile 'em high, sell 'em cheap appears to work for drones in particular in an uncertain world, but less so for taxis which like the defunct high-speed rail-link would mostly have been used to ferry the wealthiest football-fans between London and the north, where the better teams play.

From the get-go there's always been more of the smell of money round aircraft than of castor oil, or more lately kerosene.

But combine the mass-market with computers and you've got what the airlines call 'yield management', meaning prices for EVERYTHING fluctuate with demand; see below for cost of a helicopter shuttle to the British F1 Grand Prix some three months away and ask yourself if that'll change if electrified?

It's one small race-meet for a man, but one giant spell on a sun-bed for humankind.

Ed. The founder of Vertical Aerospace was inspired to produce eVTOLs by one such helicopter ride whilst attending an F1 race in Brazil... maybe tho' he'd just Googled 'is driving across rio de Janeiro dangerous'.

Thursday, March 26, 2026

Aircraft Carrier


Want the means of mounting the cat on the rear of the car to be 'just-so', which it isn't as yet so I'm looking for a fast means of swapping the tire from the tail-gate with the craft itself. To do so I find my inner Banksy and produce a stencil; I knew that dipping all of those half-potatoes in paint and transferring them to paper at the nursery would come in useful one day.


With that done I cut out the shape of the outermost bracket that is used to mount the spare, and transfer it to the hard-point on the underside of the centre-section.


And afterward I cut out the outline of the bracket using the jig-saw. The plan is to contrive a plug-and-play system where, with the spare off the car, the craft can be plugged into the tail-gate in this way and simply secured with bungee cord.

Having done this however and setting it up on the back end of the car, the problem is the width of the skis means that they conflict with the outline of the rear bumper.

I am loathe to add anything to this fairly elegant means of toting a maritime drone, so instead of using a spacer for instance to set the craft further aft, the alternative is to mount the centre-section the other way around with its topside plugged into the spare-wheel bracket.

This does appear to accommodate the outside dimensions of the booms, but now in order that the rear lift-motors do not clash with the rear-side of the vehicle the boat has to be lowered: reducing the ground-clearance.

Nonetheless it's looking like the preferred option and it turns out the bracket can be set to coincide with the centre of said centre-section. The only problem with this is that is the preferred location of the flight-control computer. It can though be fitted to the underside instead, which is something I've done in the past with other quads.

Of course there is an argument for simply allowing the lift-motors to raise the craft into the air, with the cruise motors at the year providing for manoeuvre. This tho' is not nearly so precise, which means that demo'ing the vehicle for the purpose of PR would be altogether more complicated, requiring a larger field or expanse of water.

Nothing in prototyping is ever straightforward however, as is plain from these posts.

Wednesday, March 25, 2026

Toilet Humour


I wish to thank all those who got in touch to say how worried they were that the old 'crapper' had broken down. Rest assured whilst it proved stubborn at first, I reached inside my electrical tool-box and twatted the cistern with a 2lb lump-hammer.

Despite this it remained wedded to the bowl throughout, having eventually like Rose and Jack in 'Titanic' to be separated with an angle-grinder.

Ed. Children, never do this without covering the cistern with a towel and whilst wearing both gloves and safety-goggles. Did you know that ceramic is both harder and sharper than steel? The author did after slicing his thumb open.

A Public Appeal


Searching Manchester Airport in Google Maps I note my review of December 31st of last year has been left like a 'hanging chad' with nil further, and there appears to be no means of adding a rejoinder.

Accordingly ~ but don't all do it ~ could I ask one of you, whom I'll call the 'review monitor' to post the photo above along with the following text, with italics reverted to plain text?

(Should it be rejected by AI, simply replace the word 'gay' as it refers to the above artwork with the words 'straight heterosexual'.)

Then go your way, knowing you made an old man and Manchester Airports Group very happy.

And five stars please?

Notwithstanding my mixed review after traveling at the close of 2025, using T2 recently I was delighted with the experience; not only was a coffee and croissant available for £5.50 if you looked hard enough, I bought a paperback on imminent human extinction at a book store that admittedly wants to dissociate itself from its owner W.H.Smith… and who could blame them? My experience too at the hands of the security section was altogether improved, to the extent I'll bring the family and make a day of it. And joy, looking up on leaving the section and spotting elements of the 1960s chandeliers incorporated in a gay artwork which simply lifts the spirits!

Eindecker


Loving these Russian models because as warfare turns towards wholesale adoption of drones, as we're taken back to WW1 except on a tiny and unpiloted scale.

Compare this one for example with Fokker's Eindecker more than a century prior... apparently a 'spotter' familiar to the era judging by the camera out front.

Key to their success ~ albeit at killing people ~ is the fact they are self-confessedly 'cheap' and 'simple', which are words you'll never find used in defence of the UK for instance, where everything has to be 'expensive' and 'complicated' and provided by either BAE Systems or French-owned Thales on a you-scratch-my-back basis.

There are now more admirals apparently in the Royal Navy than fighting ships for them to serve on, which is only fair with Britain being an aristocracy. But when you look at its armed forces you realise the ranks are great at what they do, but rot sets in as you go progressively higher and especially arriving at government: talent and intelligence following the inverse square law.

A friend and Chelsea supporter used to say that Newcastle's problem was that they thought they were a big club, but they weren't (though that was then).

Realistically I think we should admit that the illusion applies nowadays to the UK too and in fact we do not have to look very far for a solution. Ireland is a neutral nation that is on the up, and nor is it a member of NATO. It does maintain a standing force that includes an army, navy and air force; the latter including no fighter jets.

The way combat has changed is wholly down to one thing, which is miniaturisation of processors and associated components ~ including satellites ~ enabling them to be put into motion by artificial intelligence and sensory means like Dr Frankenstein's monster.

And thus when it comes to sustaining life, small is beautiful...

...just as it is when it comes to destroying it too.